> (no I won't give refs).
Nuff said, move on everyone.
On 5 April 2016 20:23:48 IST, Jonathan Cline <jcline@ieee.org> wrote:
It is a controversial theme because it is threatening. Science, though (no I won't give refs). Can't bear the idea that scammers win? Stores sell "baby water" for two cents more than both drinking water and distilled water (nice non-threatening pink label, too). What's that about? Is that a commercially backed version of "alternative medicine"? Could be highly entertaining to try to convince a new father or mother with the "baby water" product in their shopping cart that it is a worse product choice (because it funds the producer as well as 2 cents more for no benefits) than the generic product.
## Jonathan Cline ## jcline@ieee.org ## Mobile: +1-805-617-0223 ########################On 4/5/16 11:20 AM, Jonathan BISSON wrote:
I'm not sure whether I have a problem with your view of women, food chains, mating behavior here, or your teleological evolutionary explanations, or maybe just all of that together.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
0 comments:
Post a Comment