I'm still confused about why the foxes are mating with rabbits, or was it the other way around? Are women badgers in this analogy, or maybe polecats?
But if foxes use not-medicine and rabbits use real medicine, that explains the relative populations, right? Am I understanding this?
So lost. Such confuse.
On 5 April 2016 19:20:31 IST, Jonathan BISSON <bjonnh-diybio@bjonnh.net> wrote:
Jonathan Cline <jcline@ieee.org> writes:Very literally. Nature is designed to produce more cheaters. Women are[…]
engineered to mate with charismatic conmen when given the choice (vs.
straight laced, upstanding peers), meaning, evolution is designed to
produce ever growing quantities of the fraudsters. Therefore the callmore evolutionarily advantaged group. Not trying to be fatalistic about
it. Whether or not this means the foxes currently outnumber the rabbits
and the rabbits need to scale up their armory to slaughter the foxes, I
don't know. I only know the cheaters (the fraudsters, the foxes in this
I'm not sure whether I have a problem with your view of women, food
chains, mating behavior here, or your teleological evolutionary
explanations, or maybe just all of that together.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
0 comments:
Post a Comment