Is this summary correct ?
" The aspiration of many people in bio sciences that electronics provides macro concepts useful for application of nucleotide sequences is essentially incorrect. "
" These notions, ( that simplify life processes ), cannot be excised from viable life systems, including chaperones, post translation mRNA edits, long standing methylization attachments, and literally hundreds of biological effects implemented in life as built by Mother nature, in everything alive. "
Finally: "The reused terminology and desire to make VLSI like IDE's, ---may be useful in development of synthetic biology, but it appears this is almost simply a dead end. "
Is this possibly correct ?
Regards,
Daniel B. Kolis
PS I saw paper saying the actual wet-lab attempts with BioBricks DB plopped into glassware had a success rate by the applicable goals of each project of around 2%. My belief system is that is not zero... But the notion itself needs a full scale downgrade from first principles. What replaces it is: MORE USUAL HARD WORK AND NEW IDEAS ENTIRELY.
what do you think ?
Daniel B. Kolis
what do you think ?
Daniel B. Kolis
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/c2c6eec2-0df3-4976-b0c2-743a5bc63cd7n%40googlegroups.com.
0 comments:
Post a Comment